
THE FUTURE IS NOW!! Ok the future actually started in the late 1800’s, was used widely in the 1950’s and ‘60’s, and has again become widely popular due to new technologies (whew, I love the smell of a near run-on in the morning). I’m talking of course about
3-D movies.
I got my first real taste of 3-D as a kid when I slapped on those ridiculous
red and blue tinted paper glasses at MGM studios for
Muppet*Vision 3-D . I must admit the genre has come a long way. I remember 3-D being an excuse to create cheesy reasons for objects to be flung toward the “4th wall” / audience. While mildly enjoyable, I can’t recall ever yearning to want to see a 3-D movie ever again.
Like most who experience a mediocre “first time”, I declared myself a born again 3-D virgin. Unfortunately some bad decisions again lead me to pop my restitched 3-D cherry on a less than spectacular movie – the re-make of
Alice in Wonderland.
I can only wonder why
Tim Burton would sign up with Disney to make this movie. It may have something to do with him again teaming up with Johnny Depp. I believe this
7th meeting between the two was correctly predicted by the Mayans before the end of the world.
The movie starring the strangely attractive
Mia Wasikowska as Alice was not anything to write to Lewis Carroll about. {I’m sorry, what’s that? Lewis Carroll has been dead for over a hundred years? Well slap me and call me
#latetothepartyguy}. By the way, another reason to hate
Alice in Wonderland; Lewis Carroll was a Mormon.
The whole thing was a whole lot of CGI “magic.” The actors and actresses did their best to make it seem believable. I think they were all too aware that their efforts were going to be overshadowed by their CGI 3-D surroundings, and Tim Burton’s Johnny Depp crotch bulge. It has got to be a rough go when you reveal the ending within the first 20 minutes of the movie. {O.k. Alice is going to go on an adventure and save this world by slaying a dragon thanks for the cryptic foreshadowing, and no I didn't just give anything away}
The scenes were clearly the star of the show. The 3-D effects were not overwhelming, but added just enough to keep my interest. The greatest thing I took from the movie was that it taught a new generation that a
Jabberwocky is not a
masked dance troupe.
Secondly what I took from the movie is that this 3-D thing could and will bring many people back to the theater. Before
150” plasma screens and 9.2 – 1600 watt surround sound systems you could not get the theater experience at home. This is again the case with 3D. Before
Alice in Wonderpoop there was a preview for a 3-D documentary about a NASA space mission to fix the Hubble Telescope – snooze city right? WRONG! The 3-D images were amazing. There you were floating in space with a giant telescope coming right at your face while your fellow astronaut flew right by your fingertips. It was amazing. I think that’s what 3D is and should be used for. Not cheesy special effects that dominate the movie but to help set a mood and create better detail through depth.
But alas this is Hollywood. Why would they do something to advance the art form of cinema? All they care about is money. They will rip this 3-D technology away from us and use it for evil. How do I know this?
Because it has already begun.
In true (recent) Hollywood fashion they will beat the dead money horse with clubs made from old movie posters.
Titanic? that movie is over a decade old. Of course you knew George Lucas would get into the act with
Star Wars. Come on Hollywood PLEASE! You have a chance to do something great. Use the creative minds that first got you off your knees giving hand jobs for crack and into the studio office. 3D movies could be the next great innovation. Don't be lazy and just remaster old stuff. I would like to say that 3-D movies will bring me back to the theater, but if this is the BS you're going to pull you can forget it. Thanks for nothin' (again).
Carl Spackler